Ben Freeman, of the Project on Government Oversight, said on Monday that Panetta “abandoned” Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ plan to cut the ranks. Freeman was asked to name what Panetta would be leaving undone when he departs the job, as expected, in the next administration.
Elieen Lainez, a DOD spokeswoman, explained to the E-Ring that the efficiency program is on track to “eliminate” as planned 102 [general and flag] officer positions and “reduce” 23 additional positions to a lower rank. Of the 102 to be cut, 74 were to be slashed by March 2013. To date, Lainez said, DOD has eliminated 68 of those 74. Another 28 positions were related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and will be eliminated “as conditions on the ground warrant.”
DOD contends that rate shows Panetta has not dropped the ball on the General/Flag Officer Efficiency working group recommendations made to Gates in 2011. DOD counts the number of positions, Lainez said, instead of people on payroll because the latter includes retirees awaiting their departure or officers in between jobs.
“We are eliminating the positions as the incumbents depart, and reducing personnel through normal attrition processes (retirement, etc). Additionally, the services are simultaneously reducing their promotion selection rates to reflect the lower number of future authorizations,” she wrote in a follow-up email.
But Freeman stuck by his claim on Wednesday, calling the Pentagon’s pushback a case of apples vs. oranges -- or positions vs. actual people getting government paychecks.
“We've heard all this before, and it's fuzzy math. They're counting positions, I'm counting taxpayer dollars,” he said. “The primary goal of this initiative was to save taxpayer money and create a more efficient force structure. Gates was less concerned with positions than he was with eliminating waste. A general ‘between jobs’ is still on the payroll. He may not have all the chefs, drivers, and string quartets he's accustomed to, but he's still on the payroll.”
Freeman said the Pentagon’s rolls, as listed online, show they have not reduced the number of people they should have, by now.
“If they have dropped below 900 G/FOs, it's hard to imagine they would have not only kept quiet about it, but actively stopped updating their rosters. If they are in fact below 900 G/FOs and had made that information public, I would have been the first to commend the military for streamlining its top-ranks,” he said.
“So, again, my question for them stands: how many generals and admirals are on the DOD's payroll right now? And, why haven't they been reporting that number?”
Mark Wilson/Getty Image